Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Steve Perry's avatar

Pastor, the creed of Christ never needed reforming. Like the understanding of baptism or communion you can always point to historical theological variations, but the physical water or bread and wine always did and continue to remain. The principal meets in the physical. The arrogance would be to remove the physical because we have a more mature and full understanding of the theological. "Shall we deny the physical resurrection of Christ just because we have come to understand its theological meaning? We dare not pit the historical aspect against the theological aspect (Jordan). The very name of Christ and His headship is nothing to be mocked at, as if in a category of the perpetual virginity of Mary.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts