John, I'm not sure what you're implying. Andrew, whom I've known for over a decade, came to presbytery. We were courteous, we talked, and took a picture for ol' times' sake. I am not endorsing, nor do I follow Andrew's social media with any consistency. If these things are true and if he still desires to join the CREC, he will have to answer questions from delegates and the examining committee.
While he doesn’t explicitly endorse Kinism (online), but his views on culture, heritage, and community could be seen as adjacent to it. Actions speak louder than words but I'm open to correction here. If you feel he's made it clear he is not anti-Semitic & a kinist, than I stand corrected.
". If you think about moral order in our culture, you must begin with the role of the Church in establishing goodness as a model." If this statement is true why back Isker? He refuses to call out Joel Webbon for his sin or adultery, lust, masterbation and lies. There is not only printed evidence of Webbon's sins but lots of video evidence where he straight up lies. To deny this is to deny truth. His own words condemn him. Yet Isker says Webbon has never lied, and continues to offer full support. Personal friend or not Isker is wrong and is damaging the church by maintaining Webbon has never lied.
John, I'm not sure what you're implying. Andrew, whom I've known for over a decade, came to presbytery. We were courteous, we talked, and took a picture for ol' times' sake. I am not endorsing, nor do I follow Andrew's social media with any consistency. If these things are true and if he still desires to join the CREC, he will have to answer questions from delegates and the examining committee.
Isn't Andrew a Kinist? Are you endorsing Andrew for real?
I have not seen him address Kinism in any place. If he has, please let me know.
Andrew has also been a personal friend for over 10 years.
Although we disagree on certain things, it does not impede our Christian fellowship.
While he doesn’t explicitly endorse Kinism (online), but his views on culture, heritage, and community could be seen as adjacent to it. Actions speak louder than words but I'm open to correction here. If you feel he's made it clear he is not anti-Semitic & a kinist, than I stand corrected.
". If you think about moral order in our culture, you must begin with the role of the Church in establishing goodness as a model." If this statement is true why back Isker? He refuses to call out Joel Webbon for his sin or adultery, lust, masterbation and lies. There is not only printed evidence of Webbon's sins but lots of video evidence where he straight up lies. To deny this is to deny truth. His own words condemn him. Yet Isker says Webbon has never lied, and continues to offer full support. Personal friend or not Isker is wrong and is damaging the church by maintaining Webbon has never lied.